Plymouth Casino

Posted on
Plymouth Casino 3,7/5 8482 votes

Nation Tribe: Ione Band of Miwoks

Hwy 49
Plymouth, Amador County, CA

The Ione Band of Miwok Indians has received federal and state approvals to build a 120,000 square foot Indian gaming casino complex just 30 southeast of Sacramento.

Casino • Live Dealer • Poker • Sports
#1 Choice of U.S. Players! Mobile, tablet and desktop!
$3,750 in Welcome Bonuses! BOVADA

Plymouth, Amador County, CA The Ione Band of Miwok Indians has received federal and state approvals to build a 120,000 square foot Indian gaming casino complex just 30 southeast of Sacramento. Casino. Live Dealer. Poker. Sports #1 Choice of U.S. Corporate Casino nights in Plymouth Our Corporate Casino Hire in Plymouth is great for Staff nights out, Team building, Product launches, Client events and Office parties. We use full size casino tables including Blackjack, Roulette, Dice, Wheel of Fortune and Poker. Make your corporate event one not to forget with our casino! Booking a Plymouth Casino Party Rentals through GigSalad offers you extra protection you can’t get anywhere else. You can rest easy knowing that your payment is secure, and that we’ll have your back in the event of any trouble that may occur.

The location of this casino is in Amador County along Highway 49 in Plymouth. This is the third casino in the county. The others are has two existing casino, the Harrah's Northern California Casino in Ione and Jackson Rancheria Casino in Jackson.

News Headlines

Ione Band casino receives final state approval, compactAugust 8, 2020 - California Gov. Newsom signed a gaming compact with the Ione Band of Miwok Indians this week giving the tribe its final approval to build a new casino 30 miles southeast of Sacramento... Read moreNew Sacramento-area Indian casino land approved by FedApril 6, 2020 - Last week the federal Bureau of Indian Affairs officially notified the Ione Band of Miwok Indians of approval by the U.S. Interior Department to transfer 220 acres of tribal land into federal trust.... Read more

History

The Ione Band of Miwoks announced plans to build a casino in 2006 and submitted an application the the U.S. Department of Interior for review and approval.

On May 25, 2012 the U.S. Department of Interior approved the application. It authorized the tribe to build a casino on a 228-acre parcel of land near Plymouth in Amador County.

Court Battles

Amador County On June 29, 2012 Amador County filed a new lawsuit against the federal government in hopes of stopping the casino.

A federal judge in October 2015 rejected the lawsuit in favor of the tribe.

An activist group, No Casino in Plymouth, filed several lawsuits to stop construction of the casino. Each was unsuccessful. The last case was appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, which rejected it in October 2018.

Casino

Federal Approval (April 2020)

The Ione Band of Miwok Indians were notified in April 2020 by the U.S. Department of Interior that the tribes' plan for building a casino in Plymouth had final approval and 220 acres of tribal-owned land would be transferred into federal trust creating a sovereign reservation. See details

State Approval (August 2020)

Gov. Gavin Newsom granted the final state approval by signing a tribal-state gaming compact on Aug. 3, 2020. The compact authorizes the Inone Band of Miwok Indians to operate up to 1,200 slot machines, any card or table game legalized in California, and off-track betting on horse racing. See details

Click For Practice Play
FREE SLOTS • No Signup • Instant Play
Exclusive Free Play! Select any of these three slot games for exclusive access inside BOVADA CASINO. No player signup is required. No deposit.

777 Deluxe
A Night with Cleo
Ten Times Wins

Click For Practice Play
No Signup • Instant Play
Direct access to play casino games free inside BOVADA.

Fast & Sexy
Birds of Fury
Dragons
Big Cash Win
Champs Elysees
Catsino
Multiplier Man
Koi Garden
Mega Wins
BOVADA

Click For Practice Play
No Signup • Instant Play
Direct access to play casino games free inside BOVADA.

Blackjack
Single Deck
Double Deck
Craps
Baccarat
Roulette
Caribbean Hold'em
Let'em Ride
Poker
BOVADA

Amador Plymouth Casino

Plymouth Casino

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Phase I - Cost $47M
1,200 slot machines
40 gaming tables
Gift shop
Buffet restaurant with 250 seats
Full-service restaurant with 100 seats
Coffee bar with snack items
Sports bar

Phase II - Cost $22M
Hotel with 250 rooms
Conference center - 30,000 square feet, 1200 seats
Pool area

Casino

News Articles

Ione Band casino receives final state approval, compact

August 8, 2020

California Gov. Newsom signed a gaming compact with the Ione Band of Miwok Indians this week giving the tribe the state's final approval to build a new casino 30 miles southeast of Sacramento in Plymouth on Highway 49.

The new casino will be the third tribal casino in Amador County. It will be located 15 miles northwest of Jackson Rancheria Casino and 16 miles north of Harrah's Northern California Casino.

Final Federal Approval
The tribe received federal approval for the casino in April 2020. As the final step in the federal process, the U.S. Department of Interior agreed to transfer 220 acres of tribal-owned land into federal trust for the purpose of building a casino.

Final State Approval
The tribe received state approval for the casino on Aug. 3, 2020 when Gov. Newsom signed a gaming compact between the tribe and the state. The compact grants the tribe the rights to operate up to 1,200 slot machines, any or all card and table games that are legal in the state, and off-track horse race wagering.

Tribal chairperson Sara Dutschke released this statement following Gov. Newsom's signing of the compact:

'On behalf of the Ione Band of Miwok Indians, I would like to thank Governor Newsom and his staff for their hard work and dedication as we worked to achieve this important milestone, particularly in light of the state's many responsibilities addressing the COVID-19 pandemic, This is an exciting time for our Tribe, and we look forward to continuing to foster a strong and prosperous government-to-government relationship with the State of California and Amador County.'

'This milestone is a critical step in establishing long-term economic self-sufficiency and prosperity for our people. This opportunity will not only improve the quality of life for our Tribe, but also allow us to bring hundreds of competitive career opportunities and economic viability to our community. Revenue generated will be used to support our Tribe's social and educational programs, housing, healthcare and the preservation of cultural resources; things we have struggled to maintain and provide our members for generations.'

Back Full Page >Plymouth Casino

New Sacramento-area Indian casino land approved by Fed

April 6, 2020

Last week the federal Bureau of Indian Affairs officially notified the Ione Band of Miwok Indians of approval by the U.S. Interior Department to transfer 220 acres of tribal land into federal trust. The transfer will grant tribal sovereignty to the land and federal authorization for an Indian gaming casino.

'For the Ione Band this isn't just about the development of a gaming operation, this is really about restoring the land base we can use to support our members in the futrure,' tribal Chairwoman Sara Dutschke said in a telephone interview. 'We've waited a very long time for this.'

Since announcing its casino plans back in 2006, the tribe has continually fought court battles and opposition from activists groups to reach this point in the approval process.

When the casino is built, it will be the third Indian casino in Amador County - joining Harrah's Northern California Casino and Jackson Rancheria Casino.

Back Full Page >Plymouth Casino

Plymouth Casino


VOTED #1
Most Popular Online Casino USA

Most players - Most visits

CASINO • LIVE DEALER • POKER • SPORTSBOOK • RACEBOOK

$3,000 Casino Welcome Bonus- 100% Match Bonus redeemable 3 times up to $3,000 total. 300+ Games, Leaderboards, Live Dealers, MobileLive Dealer Games
Play Blackjack, Baccarat, Roulette or Super 6 with a live dealer. Get either the casino or the bitcoin welcome bonus.$500 Poker Welcome Bonus - '#1 Online Poker Room in U.S.' Get 100% Match Bonus up to $500. Deep player pools. deep prize pools, hundreds of weekly tournaments, mobile.$250 Sports Welcome Bonus- 50% Match Bonus up to $250 on first deposit. Live betting, live odds, bitcoin promo, mobile betting.Bitcoin Welcome Bonus- Get more bonus with bitcoins. 150% Bitcoin Casino Match Bonus up to $1,500 redeemable three times plus 50% Bitcoin Match bonus up to $500 on sports.

Disclaimer: All images are copyright to their respective owners and are used by 500 Nations for informational purposes only.

500 Nations is an independent directory and information service free of any gaming operator's control and not affiliated with any casino.
Warning: You must ensure you meet all age and other regulatory requirements before entering a casino or placing a wager. There are hundreds of jurisdictions in the world with Internet access and hundreds of different games and gambling opportunities available on the Internet. Do not assume that Internet gaming sites are in compliance with the rules and regulations of every jurisdiction from which they accept players. YOU are responsible for determining if it is legal for YOU to play any particular game or place any particular wager under the laws of the jurisdiction where you are located.

Working to Preserve Rural Amador County
Highway 49 Construction / Status of Our Lawsuit
Rumors abound that construction on the Casino has started due to the activity on Highway 49 between the 49er RV Park and the Hardware store. Contrary to what you may have heard the construction has nothing to do with the proposed casino.
The pace of our lawsuit has slowed and is the primary reason for the infrequency of updates as months and in some cases years pass with nothing to report. NCIP’s opposition to the proposed casino remains strong and continues with the recent filing of our appeal brief to the 9th Circuit by our Attorney Ken Williams.
Our appeal included a Constitutional challenge to the delegation of the Secretary of Interior’s authority under 25 USC 465 to take land into trust to a hired employee acting as the Assistant Secretary who was neither appointed by the President nor confirmed by the Senate as required by the Constitution. If we are successful with this challenge, an important precedent eliminating the current expanded fee to trust process allowing GS employees at regional offices to take land into trust could result.
We also reasserted our argument based on the Supreme Court’s 2009 Carcieri decision that the Secretary has no authority to take land into trust for the Ione Indians because they were not recognized in 1934. Our argument is based on the 1992 Federal District Court order that Ione was not in 1992 or any time prior to 1992 ever recognized by the United States. This order was based on the fact that the Ione Indians admitted they were not a treaty tribe and presented no evidence to the Court that they were recognized by an act of Congress, via a Court decision, or by completing the Section 84 recognition process. The final decision in 1996 included a finding of no recognizable tribal government at Ione and was not appealed by the Ione Band or the Federal government and is binding on both parties.
Reply briefs from the Defendants and the intervenor Ione Band were due in June but the defendants have been granted a 30 day extension so our reply will now be due in September.
Until then we continue to wait and we remain confident that we will prevail in this matter on appeal at the 9thCircuit.
We are planning a fund raising event later this year.
On a related note, NCIP continues to monitor significant Indian law cases at the U.S. Supreme Court and during the recent term the Supreme Court accepted five Indian related cases. This was extraordinary as the Court has not in last 100 years accepted this many Indian cases. Three of the cases have been decided but the two with the most far reaching impact to Federal Indian Policy, (Dollar General and Bryant) have been argued with decisions from the Court before adjournment in late June.

Plymouth Casino Poker

The first of three decided cases was Menominee Tribe v. United States. This case was believed to be a routine contract payment dispute that turned into much more. After deciding the contract issue in favor of the United States, the Court then went further in declaring that all statutes of the United States will be interpreted based on what it actually says for everyone. This effectively removes the deference/preference to Indians that laws should be interpreted for their benefit. This was a unanimous decision of the Court.
We are encouraged that major changes in federal Indian policy are likely this year from the unanimous decisions in two more Indian cases. These two cases involve issues whether State jurisdiction can be displaced by the United States after jurisdiction has been vested in the State. In Nebraska v. Parker the question involved whether an 1882 surplus land act was intended by Congress to diminish the Omaha reservation. The Supreme Court decided the statute was ambiguous as to congressional intent to diminish and decided the reservation was not diminished. The unanimous decision written by Justice Thomas explained that a reservation that had been “opened” under the public land laws was not “Indian country” and whether the tribe had any jurisdiction over the area in question should be determined by the courts below by applying the factors in City of Sherrill as suggested in Amicus briefs from CERF and the Village of Hobart, Wisconsin. If the factors in the City of Sherrill decision are applied then jurisdiction over the lands in question will remain with the State of Nebraska.
The other case with issues related to State jurisdiction versus Federal jurisdiction involved an Alaska business man, Mr. Sturgeon, who was told by the National Park Service he could not operate his hovercraft ferry on an Alaskan river because it was in a “national conservation area”. The congressional act allowing the set up of “national conservation areas” to be administered by the National Park Service specifically prohibits the Park Service from displacing the sovereignty of the State of Alaska to the waterways, state land and all private property within the declared bounds of the conservation area. The Park Service by regulation displaced the State jurisdiction, and refused to give the State any real explanation as to the source for their alleged authority. The Park Service said the alleged authority was generally based on the Commerce Clause without identifying any specific source for the authority.
At oral argument all the Supreme Court Justices were focused on the source of the alleged authority. The U.S. attorneys were going to have to explain specifically the source for the authority to displace the State’s jurisdiction to the Court. The assistant Solicitor General evaded every question from the Justices as to the source of the authority and the Justices became noticeably agitated at the U.S. attorneys. Finally, a combination of questioning from all the Justices including Chief Justice Roberts forced the associate solicitor to admit the source for the authority was the Commerce Clause which caused the Justices to become noticeably agitated After quieting the angry Justices, Chief Justice Roberts very assertively stated to the associate solicitor that she was going to answer his questions specifically or she would be held in contempt.
The associate solicitor then explained the United States could reassert the reserved rights doctrine even though Congress had disposed of all of the Indian lands in Alaska because there had in the past been Indians in Alaska. The United States was claiming because there had been reserved rights in Alaska in the past the United States could at any time reassert the long ago disposed of reserved rights and remove State jurisdiction under the Commerce Clause.

Plymouth Casino California

When she finished with this explanation there was an audible gasp from attorneys in the courtroom. The United States was arguing that since the Supreme Court had deferred for more than 150 years to the plenary authority of Congress and the Executive Branch over Indians and denied individual Indians rights guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution that the United States now believed they could at any time apply the reserve rights doctrine to remove state jurisdiction under any regulation of the United States.
CERA/CERF is pleased that Chief Justice Roberts stated in the unanimous opinion in Sturgeon that the United States has no continuing authority to assert it can change the rule of law by attempting to extend their jurisdiction by promulgating a regulation that claims jurisdiction over non-public lands. (State lands) The Court ruled that jurisdiction of the United States only applies to lands it still holds as public lands. This seemingly obvious conclusion could present problems to the current manner in which the fee to trust process is administered by the BIA and Dept. of the Interior where privately owned land subject to State jurisdiction is routinely taken into trust pursuant to the regulations at 25 C.F.R. 151.

Plymouth Casino 2021

NCIP attorney Ken Williams continues to monitor and review the Court’s decisions and determine whether and how the decisions may impact our case while waiting for the Court’s decisions in Dollar General and Bryant. NCIP will provide an update on the impact if any on our case when those decisions come down.

Casino Plymouth Ca

NCIP THANKS YOU for your Continued Interest & Support